close

Вход

Забыли?

вход по аккаунту

код для вставкиСкачать
Group A2
- National position
- Stakeholders involvement
- Legislative framework
- Safeguards
QUESTIONS / DIFFICULTIES
1.
The role of NEPIO – Operator vs. Government
2.
Is There enough uranium to fuel to new development?
3.
4.
5.
Are there enough technical competencies available to
evaluate a decision to proceed?
What does a graduated approach mean when you have no
capability?
To what extent should design information be presented to
TM/WSP
5-9 Nov. 2007
the Agency for safeguards
considerations?
1
Group A2
- National position
- Stakeholders involvement
- Legislative framework
- Safeguards
MISSING / NEED CLARIFICATION
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
Capability ability of industry to meet the anticipated
demand.
Evaluate where you are to determine where you need to
go.
Examples of countries in similar situation and how they
proceeded.
Milestones document does not have promotional aspect
which needs to be part of nuclear law.
Prescriptive versus performance based regulations.
TM/WSP 5-9 Nov. 2007
2
Group A2
- National position
-
Means to evaluate status
1.
Continuous self-assessment – want IAEA guidance
2.
Followed by peer review by international experts
3.
This peer review followed by assessment of Milestones
against criteria to be developed. Possibly IAEA review
service similar to IRRS or OSART
TM/WSP 5-9 Nov. 2007
3
Group A2
- Stakeholders involvement
-
Means to evaluate status
TM/WSP 5-9 Nov. 2007
4
Group A2
- Legislative framework
-
Means to evaluate status
TM/WSP 5-9 Nov. 2007
5
Group A2
- Legislative framework
Means to evaluate status
TM/WSP 5-9 Nov. 2007
6
1/--страниц
Пожаловаться на содержимое документа